BAMO vs. ASET

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BAMO (Brookstone Opportunities ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. BAMO is actively managed, while ASET is passively managed. BAMO charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.

Performance

BAMO vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BAMO

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 14.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMO vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	5.70%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%

Return for Risk

BAMO vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMO

BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 66
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

ASET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMO vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMO	ASET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.87	—	—

Drawdowns

BAMO vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMO drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMO and ASET.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMO	ASET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.72%	0.00%	-12.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	0.00%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	0.00%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAMO	ASET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.72%	0.00%	+6.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.58%	0.00%	+9.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.58%	0.00%	+9.58%

BAMO vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMO has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMO vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

BAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	1.46%	1.54%	1.58%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BAMO or ASET?

On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMO or ASET?

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BAMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMO or ASET?

BAMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between BAMO and ASET?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BAMO and 0.57% for ASET.