BAMO vs. BAMV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV).

BAMO and BAMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAMO is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023. BAMV is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.

Performance

BAMO vs. BAMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BAMO vs. BAMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	-2.42%	9.16%	14.39%	7.75%
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	0.50%	7.66%	12.03%	13.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMO achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than BAMV's 0.50% return.

BAMO

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: -2.42%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 9.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMV

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 5.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMO vs. BAMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMO has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMV's 0.95% expense ratio.

BAMO

Brookstone Opportunities ETF

BAMV

Brookstone Value Stock ETF

Return for Risk

BAMO vs. BAMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMO

BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 54
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

BAMV

BAMV Risk / Return Rank: 22
BAMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BAMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BAMV Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BAMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BAMV Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMO vs. BAMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMO	BAMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.33	+0.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	0.57	+0.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.08	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	0.52	+0.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	2.13	+4.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMO vs. BAMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the BAMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMO and BAMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMO	BAMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.33	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	0.99	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between BAMO and BAMV is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BAMO vs. BAMV - Dividend Comparison

BAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than BAMV's 1.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	1.58%	1.54%	1.58%	0.48%
BAMV Brookstone Value Stock ETF	1.26%	1.32%	3.66%	0.19%

Drawdowns

BAMO vs. BAMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMO drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, smaller than the maximum BAMV drawdown of -14.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMO and BAMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMO	BAMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.72%	-14.56%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-11.61%	+4.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	-3.80%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-2.09%	+0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	2.87%	-1.32%

Volatility

BAMO vs. BAMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) is 3.04%, while Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that BAMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMO	BAMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	4.10%	-1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.10%	9.03%	-3.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.80%	16.72%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.72%	13.89%	-4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.72%	13.89%	-4.17%