BAMD vs. SEIV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BAMD (Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF) and SEIV (SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMD returned 14.82% vs 41.26% for SEIV. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BAMD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.

Performance

BAMD vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMD achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 19.61% return.

BAMD

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: 10.21%
• YTD: 14.83%
• 1Y: 14.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.42%

SEIV

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 3.04%
• 6M: 17.35%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 1Y: 41.26%
• 3Y*: 24.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	$371.10K	$400.27K	$401.31K
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	$8.91M	$9.09M	$6.11M

BAMD vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	14.83%	-1.33%	19.76%	10.73%
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	19.61%	27.43%	19.73%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMD and SEIV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.63

The correlation between BAMD and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

BAMD vs. SEIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMD	SEIV
Financial Services	26.8%	23.0%
Energy	14.8%	0.9%
Technology	13.5%	17.0%
Utilities	12.9%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	12.4%	3.9%
Industrials	4.5%	1.9%
Healthcare	4.2%	18.1%
Communication Services	4.1%	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	18.5%
Basic Materials	2.6%	6.1%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.2%

Return for Risk

BAMD vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 58
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SEIV

SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 95
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAMD vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAMD	SEIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	3.07	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	4.18	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.55	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	5.66	-3.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	21.01	-15.16

BAMD vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMD and SEIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAMD vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMD drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMD and SEIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMD	SEIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-18.18%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-6.95%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-0.83%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-3.42%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	1.87%	+0.68%

Volatility

BAMD vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) is 3.03%, while SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that BAMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMD	SEIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	3.31%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	9.48%	-2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.50%	12.82%	-2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.20%	16.54%	-3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.20%	16.54%	-3.34%

BAMD vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMD vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

BAMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than SEIV's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.36%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%	0.00%
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	1.44%	1.51%	1.66%	2.08%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMD and SEIV in my portfolio?

BAMD and SEIV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMD or SEIV?

SEIV has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to BAMD (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMD dropped -15.91% vs SEIV's -18.18%.

Which ETF is better, BAMD or SEIV?

On 1-year performance, SEIV leads with 41.26% vs 14.82% for BAMD. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BAMD has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMD or SEIV?

Over the 1-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 41.26% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMD or SEIV?

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BAMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMD or SEIV?

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 1.44% for SEIV.

What is the main difference between BAMD and SEIV?

They also come from different issuers: Brookstone and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BAMD and 0.15% for SEIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.