SEIV vs. BLCV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SEIV (SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF) and BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SEIV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BLCV.

Performance

SEIV vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SEIV

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 3.04%
• 6M: 17.35%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 1Y: 41.26%
• 3Y*: 24.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.48%

BLCV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	$8.91M	$9.09M	$6.11M

SEIV vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	19.61%	27.43%	19.73%	17.41%
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	6.47%	19.96%	12.63%	14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIV and BLCV is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023	0.84

The correlation between SEIV and BLCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEIV vs. BLCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEIV	BLCV
Financial Services	23.0%	16.5%
Consumer Cyclical	18.5%	14.0%
Healthcare	18.1%	14.4%
Technology	17.0%	17.8%
Communication Services	6.5%	4.9%
Basic Materials	6.1%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	6.4%
Utilities	2.4%	4.3%
Industrials	1.9%	10.6%
Real Estate	1.2%	2.6%
Energy	0.9%	5.4%

Return for Risk

SEIV vs. BLCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEIV

SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 95
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 95

BLCV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEIV vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEIV	BLCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.01	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIV	BLCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SEIV	BLCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	—	—

SEIV vs. BLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCV's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEIV vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison

SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while BLCV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.01%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%	0.00%
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	1.44%	1.51%	1.66%	2.08%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEIV and BLCV in my portfolio?

SEIV and BLCV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SEIV or BLCV?

On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEIV or BLCV?

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEIV or BLCV?

SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.01% for BLCV.

What is the main difference between SEIV and BLCV?

They also come from different issuers: SEI and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIV and 0.55% for BLCV.