PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SEIV vs. XLFQ.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SEIVXLFQ.L
YTD Return24.69%29.91%
1Y Return39.49%40.83%
Sharpe Ratio3.132.94
Sortino Ratio4.204.49
Omega Ratio1.571.57
Calmar Ratio4.784.63
Martin Ratio19.9321.57
Ulcer Index1.93%1.87%
Daily Std Dev12.27%13.65%
Max Drawdown-18.18%-35.39%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.09%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between SEIV and XLFQ.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SEIV vs. XLFQ.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SEIV achieves a 24.69% return, which is significantly lower than XLFQ.L's 29.91% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.87%
18.42%
SEIV
XLFQ.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SEIV vs. XLFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLFQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
Expense ratio chart for SEIV: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for XLFQ.L: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SEIV vs. XLFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) and Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEIV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 3.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 4.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SEIV, currently valued at 18.42, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.42
XLFQ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 4.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.65
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 6.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 23.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0023.04

SEIV vs. XLFQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIV Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the XLFQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIV and XLFQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.96
3.42
SEIV
XLFQ.L

Dividends

SEIV vs. XLFQ.L - Dividend Comparison

SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while XLFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
1.63%2.08%1.63%
XLFQ.L
Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SEIV vs. XLFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIV drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, smaller than the maximum XLFQ.L drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIV and XLFQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
SEIV
XLFQ.L

Volatility

SEIV vs. XLFQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) is 3.95%, while Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that SEIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.95%
6.03%
SEIV
XLFQ.L