PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAGSX vs. BMBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAGSX vs. BMBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than BMBSX's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BAGSX has outperformed BMBSX with an annualized return of 1.48%, while BMBSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.39% annualized return.


BAGSX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.84%
6M
-0.61%
YTD
-0.44%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
1.48%
ALL TIME*
3.90%

BMBSX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-0.49%
YTD
0.23%
1Y
3.00%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
0.60%
10Y*
1.39%
ALL TIME*
2.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BAGSX vs. BMBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
-0.44%7.11%1.63%6.12%-13.52%-1.74%8.42%9.17%-0.55%3.90%
BMBSX
Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
0.23%4.32%1.37%4.01%-5.99%0.01%4.23%5.66%0.90%2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BAGSX and BMBSX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2001

0.53

The correlation between BAGSX and BMBSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (10 years) to 0.60 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAGSX vs. BMBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BAGSX
BAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BMBSX
BMBSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BMBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BMBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BAGSX vs. BMBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAGSXBMBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.49

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.70

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

5.02

-2.57

BAGSX vs. BMBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the BMBSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGSX and BMBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAGSX vs. BMBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than BMBSX's maximum drawdown of -9.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and BMBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAGSXBMBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-9.57%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-1.98%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.11%

-3.02%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-9.57%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.97%

-9.57%

-9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-1.41%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-1.40%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

0.67%

+0.49%

Volatility

BAGSX vs. BMBSX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) at 0.64%. This indicates that BAGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAGSXBMBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.64%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.45%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

1.71%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

2.52%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

2.79%

+2.11%

BAGSX vs. BMBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAGSX and BMBSX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

BAGSX vs. BMBSX - Dividend Comparison

BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than BMBSX's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
3.86%3.69%3.62%3.10%2.33%1.68%3.02%2.41%2.53%2.21%1.96%2.14%
BMBSX
Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
2.81%2.71%2.52%2.21%1.70%1.49%1.67%2.28%2.08%2.00%1.97%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAGSX and BMBSX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAGSX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to BMBSX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGSX dropped -18.97% vs BMBSX's -9.57%.

BMBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAGSX and BMBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer