BMBSX vs. BMDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX).
BMBSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Mar 29, 2001. BMDSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Dec 29, 2000.
Performance
BMBSX vs. BMDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BMBSX vs. BMDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBSX Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | -0.09% | 4.32% | 1.37% | 4.01% | -5.99% | 0.01% | 4.23% | 5.66% | 0.90% | 2.97% |
BMDSX Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.25% | 4.88% | -1.16% | 19.91% | -27.86% | 21.81% | 34.56% | 35.94% | -1.52% | 26.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMBSX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than BMDSX's -2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BMBSX has underperformed BMDSX with an annualized return of 1.50%, while BMDSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.74% annualized return.
BMBSX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.50%
BMDSX
- 1D
- 3.12%
- 1M
- -7.09%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BMBSX vs. BMDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMBSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BMDSX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BMBSX vs. BMDSX — Risk / Return Rank
BMBSX
BMDSX
BMBSX vs. BMDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMBSX | BMDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 0.54 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.16 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.15 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.05 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 2.82 | +3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMBSX | BMDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.54 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.03 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.46 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.35 | +0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between BMBSX and BMDSX is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BMBSX vs. BMDSX - Dividend Comparison
BMBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than BMDSX's 28.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBSX Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.52% | 2.21% | 1.70% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 2.28% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.12% |
BMDSX Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund | 28.40% | 27.76% | 4.57% | 2.44% | 1.79% | 17.82% | 10.09% | 5.77% | 6.62% | 4.87% | 0.00% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
BMBSX vs. BMDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMBSX drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, smaller than the maximum BMDSX drawdown of -53.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMBSX and BMDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMBSX | BMDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -53.96% | +44.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -12.95% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -36.24% | +26.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.57% | -36.24% | +26.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -15.67% | +13.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -10.72% | +9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 4.82% | -4.11% |
Volatility
BMBSX vs. BMDSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) is 0.79%, while Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that BMBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BMBSX | BMDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 6.21% | -5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 18.65% | -17.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 25.35% | -22.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 22.18% | -19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 21.34% | -18.56% |