BMBSX vs. BSBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX).
BMBSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Mar 29, 2001. BSBIX is a passively managed fund by Baird that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U.S. Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2004.
Performance
BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBSX Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | -0.09% | 4.32% | 1.37% | 4.01% | -5.99% | 0.01% | 4.23% | 5.66% | 0.90% | 2.97% |
BSBIX Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class | 0.27% | 5.67% | 4.99% | 5.65% | -3.64% | -0.42% | 4.23% | 4.68% | 1.49% | 1.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMBSX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than BSBIX's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BMBSX has underperformed BSBIX with an annualized return of 1.50%, while BSBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.51% annualized return.
BMBSX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.50%
BSBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMBSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BSBIX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BMBSX vs. BSBIX — Risk / Return Rank
BMBSX
BSBIX
BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMBSX | BSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 3.02 | -1.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 4.76 | -3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.81 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 4.54 | -3.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 20.13 | -14.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMBSX | BSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 3.02 | -1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 1.28 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 1.51 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 1.64 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between BMBSX and BSBIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Dividend Comparison
BMBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than BSBIX's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBSX Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.52% | 2.21% | 1.70% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 2.28% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.12% |
BSBIX Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.30% | 4.35% | 4.34% | 3.41% | 1.79% | 1.42% | 2.61% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 1.73% | 1.60% | 1.62% |
Drawdowns
BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMBSX drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, which is greater than BSBIX's maximum drawdown of -5.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMBSX and BSBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMBSX | BSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.57% | -5.95% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -0.94% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | -5.95% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.57% | -5.95% | -3.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.59% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -0.55% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.21% | +0.50% |
Volatility
BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Volatility Comparison
Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that BMBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BMBSX | BSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 0.53% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 0.86% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 1.42% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 1.93% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 1.67% | +1.11% |