BMBSX vs. BSBIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BMBSX (Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund) and BSBIX (Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - BMBSX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Baird, while BSBIX is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U.S. Government/Credit Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, BMBSX returned 1.57%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for BSBIX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMBSX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for BSBIX.

Performance

BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMBSX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than BSBIX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BMBSX has underperformed BSBIX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while BSBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.

BMBSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: 4.92%
• 3Y*: 3.30%
• 5Y*: 0.87%
• 10Y*: 1.57%

BSBIX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.73%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 3.89%
• 3Y*: 5.10%
• 5Y*: 2.49%
• 10Y*: 2.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BMBSX Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund	0.99%	4.32%	1.37%	4.01%	-5.99%	0.01%	4.23%	5.66%	0.90%	2.97%
BSBIX Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class	0.73%	5.67%	4.99%	5.65%	-3.64%	-0.42%	4.23%	4.68%	1.49%	1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BMBSX and BSBIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2004	0.39

Return for Risk

BMBSX vs. BSBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMBSX

BMBSX Risk / Return Rank: 74
BMBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BMBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BMBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BMBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BMBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BSBIX

BSBIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
BSBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BSBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BSBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BSBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BSBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMBSX	BSBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	3.07	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.65	4.92	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.86	1.82	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	4.28	-1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.57	18.62	-10.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMBSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is comparable to the BSBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMBSX and BSBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMBSX	BSBIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	3.07	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	1.29	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	1.49	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	1.64	-0.50

Drawdowns

BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMBSX drawdown since its inception was -9.57%, which is greater than BSBIX's maximum drawdown of -5.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMBSX and BSBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMBSX	BSBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.57%	-5.95%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.98%	-0.94%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.27%	-0.94%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.57%	-5.95%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.57%	-5.95%	-3.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.13%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-0.55%	-0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	0.22%	+0.38%

Volatility

BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) has a higher volatility of 0.70% compared to Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX) at 0.42%. This indicates that BMBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMBSX	BSBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	0.42%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.31%	0.98%	+0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62%	1.31%	+0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.51%	1.94%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.79%	1.67%	+1.12%

BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMBSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BSBIX's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMBSX vs. BSBIX - Dividend Comparison

BMBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than BSBIX's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMBSX Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund	2.76%	2.71%	2.52%	2.21%	1.70%	1.49%	1.67%	2.28%	2.08%	2.00%	1.97%	2.12%
BSBIX Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class	4.27%	4.35%	4.34%	3.41%	1.79%	1.42%	2.61%	2.49%	2.20%	1.73%	1.60%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMBSX and BSBIX in my portfolio?

BMBSX and BSBIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMBSX or BSBIX?

BMBSX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to BSBIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMBSX dropped -9.57% vs BSBIX's -5.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BMBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.