PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BMBSX vs. MINT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BMBSX and MINT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

BMBSX vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.56%
2.72%
BMBSX
MINT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BMBSX:

1.12

MINT:

13.03

Sortino Ratio

BMBSX:

1.51

MINT:

30.34

Omega Ratio

BMBSX:

1.24

MINT:

8.79

Calmar Ratio

BMBSX:

0.61

MINT:

43.88

Martin Ratio

BMBSX:

3.41

MINT:

473.69

Ulcer Index

BMBSX:

0.75%

MINT:

0.01%

Daily Std Dev

BMBSX:

2.29%

MINT:

0.44%

Max Drawdown

BMBSX:

-9.56%

MINT:

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

BMBSX:

-0.62%

MINT:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMBSX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, BMBSX has underperformed MINT with an annualized return of 1.39%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.26% annualized return.


BMBSX

YTD

0.82%

1M

0.73%

6M

0.57%

1Y

2.56%

5Y*

0.50%

10Y*

1.39%

MINT

YTD

0.71%

1M

0.45%

6M

2.72%

1Y

5.64%

5Y*

2.56%

10Y*

2.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMBSX vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMBSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.


BMBSX
Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for BMBSX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%
Expense ratio chart for MINT: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BMBSX vs. MINT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMBSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BMBSX is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BMBSX is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BMBSX is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BMBSX is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BMBSX is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BMBSX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MINT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MINT is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MINT is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BMBSX vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BMBSX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.1213.03
The chart of Sortino ratio for BMBSX, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.5130.34
The chart of Omega ratio for BMBSX, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.248.79
The chart of Calmar ratio for BMBSX, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.6143.88
The chart of Martin ratio for BMBSX, currently valued at 3.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.41473.69
BMBSX
MINT

The current BMBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 13.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMBSX and MINT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.005.0010.0015.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.12
13.03
BMBSX
MINT

Dividends

BMBSX vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

BMBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than MINT's 5.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BMBSX
Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
2.52%2.50%2.22%1.71%1.49%1.67%1.97%2.08%2.02%1.98%2.11%2.26%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
5.19%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%0.80%

Drawdowns

BMBSX vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMBSX drawdown since its inception was -9.56%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMBSX and MINT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.62%
0
BMBSX
MINT

Volatility

BMBSX vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Baird Quality Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMBSX) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) at 0.12%. This indicates that BMBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.67%
0.12%
BMBSX
MINT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab