BAC vs. MSFT.TO
BAC (Bank of America Corporation) and MSFT.TO (Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)) are both stocks. BAC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while MSFT.TO operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, BAC returned 27.43%/yr vs 2.68%/yr for MSFT.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAC vs. MSFT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BAC is traded in USD, while MSFT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MSFT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT.TO's -21.31% return.
BAC
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 13.79%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
MSFT.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -21.31%
- 6M
- -20.17%
- 1Y
- -21.14%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAC vs. MSFT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 3.72% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -0.58% |
MSFT.TO Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) | -21.31% | 18.04% | 2.58% | 60.16% | -13.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAC and MSFT.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022 | 0.25 |
The correlation between BAC and MSFT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAC vs. MSFT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BAC
MSFT.TO
BAC vs. MSFT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAC | MSFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.87 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | -0.64 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -1.32 | +5.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAC vs. MSFT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than MSFT.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and MSFT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAC | MSFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.10% | -33.98% | -59.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -33.98% | +16.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -33.98% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -28.79% | +28.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.30% | -10.97% | -17.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.96% | 16.37% | -9.41% |
Volatility
BAC vs. MSFT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 5.49%, while Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAC | MSFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 10.90% | -5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 23.11% | -6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 26.32% | -4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 27.12% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.68% | 27.12% | +3.56% |
Dividends
BAC vs. MSFT.TO - Dividend Comparison
BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than MSFT.TO's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.72% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
MSFT.TO Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BAC vs. MSFT.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BAC and MSFT.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BAC and MSFT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer