PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT.TO vs. INTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT.TO vs. INTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFT.TO is traded in CAD, while INTU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INTU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT.TO achieves a -17.82% return, which is significantly higher than INTU's -54.17% return.


MSFT.TO

1D
1.95%
1M
6.66%
6M
-12.83%
YTD
-17.82%
1Y
-22.73%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.28%

INTU

1D
0.81%
1M
9.90%
6M
-45.20%
YTD
-54.17%
1Y
-59.71%
3Y*
-13.38%
5Y*
-8.11%
10Y*
11.58%
ALL TIME*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT.TO vs. INTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSFT.TO
Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)
-17.82%12.65%11.26%56.34%-8.31%
INTU
Intuit Inc.
-54.17%1.25%9.72%57.91%-4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT.TO and INTU is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022

0.51

The correlation between MSFT.TO and INTU shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT.TO vs. INTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT.TO
MSFT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

INTU
INTU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT.TO vs. INTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFT.TOINTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.73

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

-0.89

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

-1.52

+0.35

MSFT.TO vs. INTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is higher than the INTU Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT.TO and INTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT.TO vs. INTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, smaller than the maximum INTU drawdown of -67.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.TO and INTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFT.TOINTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-67.13%

+31.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.58%

-67.13%

+31.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.58%

-67.13%

+31.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.97%

-62.54%

+35.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-12.72%

+2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.55%

39.33%

-19.78%

Volatility

MSFT.TO vs. INTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) is 10.04%, while Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a volatility of 12.37%. This indicates that MSFT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFT.TOINTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

12.37%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.42%

43.47%

-19.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

46.41%

-19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.60%

38.43%

-11.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.60%

34.90%

-8.30%

Dividends

MSFT.TO vs. INTU - Dividend Comparison

MSFT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than INTU's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTU
Intuit Inc.
1.63%0.65%0.60%0.52%0.72%0.38%0.57%0.74%0.83%0.89%1.08%1.09%
MSFT.TO
Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)
0.90%0.71%0.73%0.75%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSFT.TO vs. INTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) and Intuit Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
8.56B
(MSFT.TO) Total Revenue
(INTU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MSFT.TO values in CAD, INTU values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT.TO and INTU have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT.TO and INTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer