PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT.TO vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFT.TO is traded in CAD, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT.TO achieves a -17.82% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -14.47% return.


MSFT.TO

1D
1.95%
1M
6.66%
6M
-12.83%
YTD
-17.82%
1Y
-22.73%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.28%

MSFT

1D
2.02%
1M
5.43%
6M
-11.30%
YTD
-14.47%
1Y
-18.86%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
24.04%
ALL TIME*
14.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSFT.TO
Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)
-17.82%12.65%11.26%56.34%-8.31%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-14.47%10.31%22.49%54.43%-2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT.TO and MSFT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022

0.92

The correlation between MSFT.TO and MSFT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT.TO
MSFT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFT.TOMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.89

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

-0.55

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

-0.97

-0.19

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT.TO and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -44.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.TO and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFT.TOMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-44.28%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.58%

-34.57%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.58%

-34.57%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.97%

-25.17%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-10.56%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.55%

19.43%

+0.12%

Volatility

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) have volatilities of 10.04% and 9.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFT.TOMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

9.66%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.42%

24.12%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

27.11%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.60%

27.65%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.60%

28.06%

-1.46%

Dividends

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

MSFT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than MSFT's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.88%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
MSFT.TO
Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)
0.90%0.71%0.73%0.75%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSFT.TO vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00B60.00B70.00B80.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
82.89B
(MSFT.TO) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MSFT.TO values in CAD, MSFT values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MSFT.TO and MSFT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT.TO and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer