BABX vs. XDSQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BABX returned -1.49%/yr vs 14.89%/yr for XDSQ. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BABX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

BABX vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -34.41% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 5.19% return.

BABX

• 1D: 8.14%
• 1M: 70.32%
• 6M: -48.73%
• YTD: -34.41%
• 1Y: -8.73%
• 3Y*: -1.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.23%

XDSQ

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 2.27%
• 6M: 2.99%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 1Y: 15.96%
• 3Y*: 14.89%
• 5Y*: 9.63%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	$10.82M	$17.86M	$21.53M
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	$815.75K	$1.12M	$552.04K

BABX vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-34.41%	123.85%	1.23%	-33.89%	-9.68%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	5.19%	14.22%	23.12%	23.00%	1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and XDSQ is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022	0.33

BABX vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BABX	XDSQ
Consumer Cyclical	66.7%	9.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.1%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

BABX vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BABX

BABX Risk / Return Rank: 12
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BABX vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BABX	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	1.47	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	2.04	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.30	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	1.67	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.19	7.88	-8.07

BABX vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BABX vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -78.83%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABX	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.83%	-26.06%	-52.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.83%	-9.60%	-69.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.83%	-19.15%	-59.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.98%	0.00%	-62.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.39%	-4.82%	-41.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.06%	2.03%	+44.03%

Volatility

BABX vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 27.52% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 3.68%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BABX	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.52%	3.68%	+23.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.46%	8.20%	+50.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.46%	10.94%	+79.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.45%	15.31%	+68.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.45%	14.95%	+68.50%

BABX vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BABX vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BABX nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABX and XDSQ in my portfolio?

BABX and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BABX or XDSQ?

BABX has higher volatility (27.52%) compared to XDSQ (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -78.83% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

Which ETF is better, BABX or XDSQ?

On 3-year performance, XDSQ leads with 14.89% vs -1.49% for BABX. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BABX or XDSQ?

Over the 3-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 14.89% return vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABX or XDSQ?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABX or XDSQ?

BABX and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BABX and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.