PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABX vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABX vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -55.91% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


BABX

1D
-4.45%
1M
-37.51%
YTD
-55.91%
6M
-58.68%
1Y
-36.03%
3Y*
-7.54%
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABX vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-55.91%-17.53%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
744.89%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and LINT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.21

BABX vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BABX
LINT

Consumer Cyclical

66.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

BABX
66.6%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

BABX

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

BABX

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

BABX

-

LINT

-

Energy

BABX

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

BABX

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

BABX

-

LINT

-

Industrials

BABX

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

BABX

-

LINT

-

Technology

BABX

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

BABX

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABX vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX
BABX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABX vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABXLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

BABX vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BABX vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -75.11%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABXLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.11%

-49.54%

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.11%

-12.86%

-62.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.58%

-20.48%

-25.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.45%

Volatility

BABX vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABXLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.73%

168.83%

-81.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.85%

168.83%

-85.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.85%

168.83%

-85.98%

BABX vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

BABX vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BABX and LINT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABX and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer