BABX vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. BABX is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BABX returned -6.12%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BABX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

BABX vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -53.86% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

BABX

• 1D: -3.98%
• 1M: -34.60%
• YTD: -53.86%
• 6M: -56.67%
• 1Y: -32.89%
• 3Y*: -6.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABX vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-53.86%	123.85%	1.23%	-33.89%	-9.68%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	19.65%	3.13%	-9.58%	3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and ISCMF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022	-0.05

Return for Risk

BABX vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX

BABX Risk / Return Rank: 6
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 77
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABX vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BABX	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	1.76	-2.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	3.18	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	2.31	-1.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	5.53	-5.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	11.95	-12.79

BABX vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BABX vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -73.95%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABX	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.95%	-25.42%	-48.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.95%	-5.69%	-68.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-73.95%	-7.62%	-66.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.95%	-5.26%	-68.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.55%	-13.36%	-32.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.17%	2.63%	+36.54%

Volatility

BABX vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 15.92% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 5.11%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BABX	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.92%	5.11%	+10.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.27%	15.45%	+42.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.79%	17.87%	+69.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.86%	14.29%	+68.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.86%	14.29%	+68.57%

BABX vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BABX vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

Neither BABX nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABX and ISCMF in my portfolio?

BABX and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BABX or ISCMF?

BABX has higher volatility (15.92%) compared to ISCMF (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -73.95% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, BABX or ISCMF?

On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs -6.12% for BABX. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BABX or ISCMF?

Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs -6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABX or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABX or ISCMF?

BABX and ISCMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BABX and ISCMF?

BABX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.