PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABW vs. UNHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABW vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -17.38% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 15.08% return.


BABW

1D
-2.92%
1M
-5.34%
YTD
-17.38%
6M
-24.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UNHW

1D
0.06%
1M
2.06%
YTD
15.08%
6M
11.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABW vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BABW
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF
-17.38%-9.18%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
15.08%-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BABW and UNHW is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABW vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BABW vs. UNHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABWUNHWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.97

0.50

-1.47

Drawdowns

BABW vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -40.29%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and UNHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABWUNHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.29%

-32.28%

-8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.94%

-7.06%

-28.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.10%

-12.48%

-9.62%

Volatility

BABW vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABWUNHWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.61%

49.81%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.61%

49.81%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.61%

49.81%

-0.20%

BABW vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BABW and UNHW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

BABW vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.81%, more than UNHW's 17.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BABW
Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF
37.81%10.68%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
17.33%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


BABW and UNHW have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BABW and UNHW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

BABW has the higher dividend yield at 37.81%, compared with 17.33% for UNHW.

BABW is categorized as Derivative Income, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABW and UNHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer