UNHW vs. VHT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. UNHW is actively managed, while VHT is passively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UNHW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.

Performance

UNHW vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHW achieves a 28.78% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's 6.65% return.

UNHW

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: -2.79%
• 6M: 53.98%
• YTD: 28.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

VHT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -1.17%
• 6M: 6.86%
• YTD: 6.65%
• 1Y: 27.92%
• 3Y*: 9.09%
• 5Y*: 5.06%
• 10Y*: 9.89%
• ALL TIME*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	$422.89K	$606.85K	$362.14K
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	$66.49M	$76.90M	$73.37M

UNHW vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	28.78%	1.54%
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	6.65%	0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UNHW and VHT is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

UNHW vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UNHW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VHT

VHT Risk / Return Rank: 77
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UNHW vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UNHW	VHT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.91	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.74	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.79	—

Drawdowns

UNHW vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHW drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum VHT drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHW and VHT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNHW	VHT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.28%	-39.12%	+6.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.40%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-2.69%	-3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.82%	-5.96%	-3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNHW	VHT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.54%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.45%	15.35%	+31.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.45%	15.25%	+31.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.45%	17.02%	+29.43%

UNHW vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNHW vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.91%, more than VHT's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	21.91%	2.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	1.55%	1.61%	1.53%	1.36%	1.33%	1.14%	1.21%	1.89%	1.38%	1.31%	1.45%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNHW and VHT in my portfolio?

UNHW and VHT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNHW or VHT?

On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNHW or VHT?

VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UNHW or VHT?

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 21.91%, compared with 1.55% for VHT.

What is the main difference between UNHW and VHT?

UNHW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UNHW and 0.09% for VHT.