BABW vs. PLTW
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
BABW vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than PLTW's -15.00% return.
BABW
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 40.41%
- 6M
- -26.50%
- YTD
- -16.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTW
- 1D
- 35.54%
- 1M
- 30.08%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- -15.00%
- 1Y
- -7.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.31K | $74.82K | $59.98K | |
| $3.52M | $3.12M | $3.79M |
BABW vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -16.68% | -16.98% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -15.00% | -0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and PLTW is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTW
BABW vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABW vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and PLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.76% | -57.27% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -57.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.40% | -30.48% | -4.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -25.27% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 31.69% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.46% | 71.95% | -21.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 79.04% | -28.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 79.04% | -28.58% |
BABW vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BABW and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
BABW vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.79%, less than PLTW's 98.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 45.79% | 10.68% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 98.38% | 72.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and PLTW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BABW and PLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 98.38%, compared with 45.79% for BABW.
Find the right allocation for BABW and PLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer