BABW vs. MAGS
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
BABW vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 4.55% return.
BABW
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 40.41%
- 6M
- -26.50%
- YTD
- -16.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 1Y
- 20.85%
- 3Y*
- 31.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 37.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.31K | $74.82K | $59.98K | |
| $353.39M | $320.78M | $295.17M |
BABW vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -16.68% | -16.98% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 4.55% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and MAGS is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAGS
BABW vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABW vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.76% | -29.91% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.40% | -2.79% | -32.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -4.85% | -22.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.31% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.46% | 22.33% | +28.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 26.13% | +24.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 26.13% | +24.33% |
BABW vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABW vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.79%, more than MAGS's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 45.79% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.42% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and MAGS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 45.79%, compared with 1.42% for MAGS.
BABW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.30% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for BABW and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer