BABW vs. CHAT
BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BABW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
BABW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABW achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 52.78% return.
BABW
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 40.41%
- 6M
- -26.50%
- YTD
- -16.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 45.53%
- YTD
- 52.78%
- 1Y
- 81.24%
- 3Y*
- 46.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.31K | $74.82K | $59.98K | |
| $66.18M | $57.28M | $66.34M |
BABW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -16.68% | -16.98% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 52.78% | -2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABW and CHAT is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHAT
BABW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABW drawdown since its inception was -54.76%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABW and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.76% | -31.34% | -23.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.40% | -13.44% | -21.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -5.75% | -21.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.13% | — |
Volatility
BABW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.46% | 39.59% | +10.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 32.59% | +17.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 32.59% | +17.87% |
BABW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
BABW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.79%, more than CHAT's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 45.79% | 10.68% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.87% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 45.79%, compared with 1.87% for CHAT.
BABW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABW and 0.75% for CHAT.
Find the right allocation for BABW and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer