PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABA vs. ZTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BABA vs. ZTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than ZTO's 11.03% return.


BABA

1D
0.12%
1M
-14.13%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-26.87%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
4.42%

ZTO

1D
1.42%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
11.03%
6M
8.18%
1Y
34.99%
3Y*
-2.67%
5Y*
-4.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABA vs. ZTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-22.32%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%96.37%
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
11.03%10.69%-3.76%-19.77%-3.84%-2.40%26.25%49.50%1.20%31.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and ZTO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2016

0.46

The correlation between BABA and ZTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BABA:

$272.45B

ZTO:

$18.23B

EPS

BABA:

CN¥33.90

ZTO:

CN¥11.28

PE Ratio

BABA:

22.55

ZTO:

13.71

PEG Ratio

BABA:

1.01

ZTO:

0.72

PS Ratio

BABA:

2.26

ZTO:

2.45

PB Ratio

BABA:

1.75

ZTO:

1.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥811.51B

ZTO:

CN¥51.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥332.88B

ZTO:

CN¥12.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥112.44B

ZTO:

CN¥11.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABA vs. ZTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTO
ZTO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ZTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABA vs. ZTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABAZTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.23

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

2.14

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

5.41

-5.53

BABA vs. ZTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the ZTO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and ZTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BABA vs. ZTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than ZTO's maximum drawdown of -57.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and ZTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABAZTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.09%

-57.06%

-23.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

-15.22%

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.94%

-42.55%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.48%

-49.55%

-22.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.20%

-32.79%

-29.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.56%

-26.02%

-11.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.58%

6.03%

+13.55%

Volatility

BABA vs. ZTO - Volatility Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) at 5.65%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABAZTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

5.65%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.24%

17.24%

+12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.83%

25.87%

+17.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

38.52%

+12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.40%

38.22%

+5.18%

Dividends

BABA vs. ZTO - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than ZTO's 3.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.93%1.36%1.96%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
3.02%3.11%4.96%1.74%0.93%0.89%1.03%1.03%1.26%

Financials

BABA vs. ZTO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B20222023202420252026
35.15B
13.28B
(BABA) Total Revenue
(ZTO) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

BABA vs. ZTO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
33.4%
24.4%
Portfolio components
BABA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

ZTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.24B and revenue of 13.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

BABA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

ZTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 13.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

BABA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

ZTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. reported a net income of 2.12B and revenue of 13.28B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BABA and ZTO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABA has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to ZTO (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs ZTO's -57.06%.

ZTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABA and ZTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer