BABA vs. CROX
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — BABA in Internet Retail, CROX in Footwear & Accessories. Over the past 10 years, BABA returned 4.02%/yr vs 27.92%/yr for CROX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -18.78% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 58.19% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 4.02%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.92% annualized return.
BABA
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 10.15%
- 6M
- -26.69%
- YTD
- -18.78%
- 1Y
- -1.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- -10.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.58%
CROX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 64.43%
- YTD
- 58.19%
- 1Y
- 30.53%
- 3Y*
- 3.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.36%
BABA vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -18.78% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 58.19% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 61.24% | 105.54% | 84.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and CROX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
BABA:
$282.71B
CROX:
$6.72B
BABA:
CN¥33.85
CROX:
-$1.97
BABA:
2.37
CROX:
1.77
BABA:
1.82
CROX:
4.81
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
CROX:
$4.02B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
CROX:
$2.34B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
CROX:
$297.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
CROX
BABA vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 0.94 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 1.60 | -1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -98.74% | +18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.47% | -32.54% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.47% | -54.04% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.42% | -73.86% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | -75.18% | -4.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.47% | -25.08% | -35.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.78% | -61.13% | +23.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.84% | 19.15% | +4.69% |
Volatility
BABA vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 15.00% compared to Crocs, Inc. (CROX) at 12.53%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.00% | 12.53% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.31% | 33.08% | -3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.80% | 53.00% | -8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.74% | 55.34% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.62% | 55.99% | -12.37% |
Dividends
BABA vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.89% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BABA vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and CROX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABA has higher volatility (15.00%) compared to CROX (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs CROX's -98.74%.
CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABA and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer