AZYY vs. PLTM
AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - AZYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). AZYY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AZYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.
Performance
AZYY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZYY achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -19.56% return.
AZYY
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- -22.81%
- YTD
- -19.56%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.28K | $34.29K | $41.33K | |
| $1.27M | $1.47M | $3.03M |
AZYY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF | -8.64% | -5.56% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -19.56% | 45.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZYY and PLTM is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZYY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank
AZYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTM
AZYY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AZYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AZYY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZYY drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -44.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZYY and PLTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -44.07% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.17% | -40.58% | +22.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -18.95% | +6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.75% | — |
Volatility
AZYY vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZYY | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.60% | 50.54% | -29.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 33.15% | -12.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 31.14% | -10.54% |
AZYY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AZYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AZYY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
AZYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.96%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF | 53.96% | 15.86% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AZYY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AZYY.
AZYY has the higher dividend yield at 53.96%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.
AZYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AZYY and 0.50% for PLTM.
Find the right allocation for AZYY and PLTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer