AZYY vs. QYLD
AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AZYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. AZYY is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AZYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
AZYY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZYY achieves a -7.74% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 10.06% return.
AZYY
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -7.74%
- 6M
- -6.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 25.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
AZYY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF | -7.74% | -5.56% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 10.06% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZYY and QYLD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZYY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
AZYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QYLD
AZYY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AZYY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AZYY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZYY drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZYY and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZYY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -24.75% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.36% | -0.13% | -17.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -3.82% | -8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
AZYY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZYY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 9.50% | +12.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 14.81% | +6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 15.55% | +6.03% |
AZYY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AZYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
AZYY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
AZYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.35%, more than QYLD's 12.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF | 47.35% | 15.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 12.36% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AZYY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AZYY.
AZYY has the higher dividend yield at 47.35%, compared with 12.36% for QYLD.
AZYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AZYY and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for AZYY and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer