AZYY vs. FBL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AZYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AZYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FBL.

Performance

AZYY vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZYY achieves a -8.32% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -40.05% return.

AZYY

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: -7.68%
• YTD: -8.32%
• 6M: -8.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBL

• 1D: -5.39%
• 1M: -23.27%
• YTD: -40.05%
• 6M: -41.57%
• 1Y: -53.11%
• 3Y*: 19.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZYY vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF	-8.32%	-5.56%
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-40.05%	-29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AZYY and FBL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

AZYY vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 3
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZYY vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AZYY	FBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.88	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.50	—

Drawdowns

AZYY vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZYY drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZYY and FBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AZYY	FBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.12%	-61.15%	+38.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-61.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-61.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.88%	-61.15%	+43.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.35%	-17.06%	+4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	35.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AZYY	FBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	26.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	56.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.52%	72.30%	-50.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.52%	71.34%	-49.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.52%	71.34%	-49.82%

AZYY vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AZYY vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

AZYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.65%, more than FBL's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF	47.65%	15.86%	0.00%	0.00%
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	3.46%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AZYY and FBL in my portfolio?

AZYY and FBL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AZYY or FBL?

On fees, AZYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AZYY or FBL?

AZYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for FBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AZYY or FBL?

AZYY has the higher dividend yield at 47.65%, compared with 3.46% for FBL.

What is the main difference between AZYY and FBL?

AZYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AZYY and 1.15% for FBL.