AWR vs. ABT
AWR (American States Water Company) and ABT (Abbott Laboratories) are both stocks. AWR operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities), while ABT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, AWR returned 8.51%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for ABT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AWR vs. ABT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWR achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's -26.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AWR has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 8.51%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.
AWR
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- -3.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
ABT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- -26.95%
- 6M
- -25.03%
- 1Y
- -30.87%
- 3Y*
- -1.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
AWR vs. ABT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWR American States Water Company | 7.54% | -4.32% | -1.18% | -11.43% | -8.92% | 32.25% | -6.75% | 31.19% | 17.91% | 29.76% |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | -26.95% | 12.87% | 4.81% | 2.26% | -20.68% | 30.53% | 28.04% | 22.08% | 29.06% | 52.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWR and ABT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AWR and ABT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AWR:
$3.01B
ABT:
$158.10B
AWR:
$3.44
ABT:
$3.59
AWR:
22.34
ABT:
25.21
AWR:
2.10
ABT:
1.57
AWR:
4.39
ABT:
3.51
AWR:
2.83
ABT:
2.39
AWR:
$679.25M
ABT:
$45.13B
AWR:
$303.17M
ABT:
$25.45B
AWR:
$233.31M
ABT:
$10.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWR vs. ABT — Risk / Return Rank
AWR
ABT
AWR vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American States Water Company (AWR) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWR | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.77 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.79 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | -1.79 | +2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWR | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | -1.27 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | -0.08 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.47 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.49 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
AWR vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWR drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, smaller than the maximum ABT drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWR and ABT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWR | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.39% | -45.66% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -38.99% | +27.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.36% | -39.64% | +14.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.85% | -39.64% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.85% | -39.64% | +6.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.98% | -33.84% | +15.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -10.83% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 17.23% | -10.82% |
Volatility
AWR vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American States Water Company (AWR) is 4.82%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that AWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWR | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 8.41% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.05% | 19.45% | -4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 24.42% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 22.04% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 23.67% | +2.49% |
Dividends
AWR vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison
AWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than ABT's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 2.70% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% |
AWR American States Water Company | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.30% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.35% | 1.61% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.01% | 2.08% |
Financials
AWR vs. ABT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American States Water Company and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AWR vs. ABT - Profitability Comparison
AWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American States Water Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 169.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ABT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 6.28B and revenue of 11.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.3%.
AWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American States Water Company reported an operating income of 51.37M and revenue of 169.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.
ABT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 11.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
AWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American States Water Company reported a net income of 29.95M and revenue of 169.19M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
ABT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 11.16B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AWR and ABT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABT has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to AWR (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWR dropped -37.39% vs ABT's -45.66%.
AWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWR and ABT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer