PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AWR vs. CWT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AWRCWT
YTD Return8.61%0.16%
1Y Return13.09%6.61%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.72%-4.97%
5Y Return (Ann)2.11%2.22%
10Y Return (Ann)11.70%9.63%
Sharpe Ratio0.630.26
Sortino Ratio1.050.54
Omega Ratio1.121.06
Calmar Ratio0.410.16
Martin Ratio1.390.68
Ulcer Index9.61%8.77%
Daily Std Dev21.16%23.21%
Max Drawdown-37.39%-36.49%
Current Drawdown-12.40%-25.04%

Fundamentals


AWRCWT
Market Cap$3.26B$3.08B
EPS$2.96$3.39
PE Ratio29.1814.99
PEG Ratio6.852.70
Total Revenue (TTM)$577.54M$1.03B
Gross Profit (TTM)$409.75M$433.58M
EBITDA (TTM)$206.37M$394.23M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between AWR and CWT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AWR vs. CWT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AWR achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than CWT's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AWR has outperformed CWT with an annualized return of 11.70%, while CWT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.16%
-2.68%
AWR
CWT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AWR vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American States Water Company (AWR) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AWR, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AWR, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AWR, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AWR, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AWR, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.39
CWT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CWT, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.68

AWR vs. CWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the CWT Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWR and CWT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.63
0.26
AWR
CWT

Dividends

AWR vs. CWT - Dividend Comparison

AWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than CWT's 2.16% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AWR
American States Water Company
1.54%2.06%1.65%1.35%1.61%1.34%1.58%1.72%2.01%2.08%2.21%2.65%
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.16%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%2.64%2.77%

Drawdowns

AWR vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWR drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, roughly equal to the maximum CWT drawdown of -36.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWR and CWT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.40%
-25.04%
AWR
CWT

Volatility

AWR vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American States Water Company (AWR) is 5.74%, while California Water Service Group (CWT) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that AWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.74%
6.81%
AWR
CWT

Financials

AWR vs. CWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American States Water Company and California Water Service Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items