PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWR vs. CWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

AWR vs. CWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American States Water Company (AWR) and California Water Service Group (CWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AWR vs. CWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWR
American States Water Company
5.06%-4.32%-1.18%-11.43%-8.92%32.25%-6.75%31.19%17.91%29.76%
CWT
California Water Service Group
5.43%-1.81%-10.64%-12.83%-14.13%35.05%6.68%9.85%7.06%36.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AWR:

$2.92B

CWT:

$2.71B

EPS

AWR:

$3.37

CWT:

$2.15

PE Ratio

AWR:

22.42

CWT:

21.09

PEG Ratio

AWR:

2.11

CWT:

0.51

PS Ratio

AWR:

4.44

CWT:

2.70

PB Ratio

AWR:

2.80

CWT:

1.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

AWR:

$658.07M

CWT:

$1.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AWR:

$0.00

CWT:

$436.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

AWR:

$170.81M

CWT:

$329.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWR achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than CWT's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AWR has outperformed CWT with an annualized return of 8.71%, while CWT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.


AWR

1D
-1.43%
1M
1.46%
YTD
5.06%
6M
4.56%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
-3.02%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
8.71%

CWT

1D
-1.54%
1M
0.58%
YTD
5.43%
6M
0.20%
1Y
-3.91%
3Y*
-5.76%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
7.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWR vs. CWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWR
AWR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CWT
CWT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWR vs. CWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American States Water Company (AWR) and California Water Service Group (CWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWRCWTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.07

-0.17

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.05

-0.08

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.99

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

-0.22

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.01

-0.37

+0.35

AWR vs. CWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWR Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the CWT Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWR and CWT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AWRCWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

-0.17

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

-0.09

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.27

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.31

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between AWR and CWT is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AWR vs. CWT - Dividend Comparison

AWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than CWT's 2.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWR
American States Water Company
2.62%2.68%2.30%2.06%1.65%1.35%1.61%1.34%1.58%1.72%2.01%2.08%
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.72%2.86%2.47%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%

Drawdowns

AWR vs. CWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWR drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, roughly equal to the maximum CWT drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWR and CWT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AWRCWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.39%

-38.21%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-16.03%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-38.21%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.85%

-38.21%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.87%

-30.76%

+10.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-11.59%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

9.56%

-2.53%

Volatility

AWR vs. CWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American States Water Company (AWR) is 6.99%, while California Water Service Group (CWT) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that AWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AWRCWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

8.43%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

17.84%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.97%

23.04%

-3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

23.85%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.28%

27.56%

-1.28%

Financials

AWR vs. CWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American States Water Company and California Water Service Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
164.28M
219.98M
(AWR) Total Revenue
(CWT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items