AWAYX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
AWAYX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Sep 1, 2003. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
AWAYX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AWAYX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAYX AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy | -1.74% | 21.59% | 19.08% | 21.06% | -18.42% | 20.57% | 13.04% | 25.57% | -9.68% | 22.02% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWAYX achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AWAYX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.93%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
AWAYX
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AWAYX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWAYX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AWAYX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
AWAYX
FGIAX
AWAYX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWAYX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 1.79 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 2.30 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.73 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 12.62 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWAYX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.79 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.58 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAYX and FGIAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AWAYX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
AWAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAYX AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy | 7.49% | 7.36% | 5.97% | 2.54% | 7.90% | 9.02% | 3.05% | 4.11% | 3.94% | 7.73% | 6.17% | 1.87% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
AWAYX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAYX drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAYX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAYX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.32% | -49.35% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.66% | -8.29% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.40% | -21.08% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.32% | -38.02% | +3.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -3.06% | -3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -7.22% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.79% | +0.89% |
Volatility
AWAYX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that AWAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AWAYX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 4.15% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 7.07% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 12.28% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 13.08% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 15.17% | +1.60% |