PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWAYX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWAYX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWAYX achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, AWAYX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.61%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


AWAYX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.69%
YTD
12.24%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
12.61%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWAYX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWAYX
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy
12.24%21.59%19.08%21.06%-18.42%20.57%13.04%25.57%-9.68%22.02%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AWAYX and VOO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.96

The correlation between AWAYX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWAYX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWAYX
AWAYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AWAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AWAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWAYX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWAYXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.67

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.63

11.96

+0.67

AWAYX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWAYX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWAYX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWAYX drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAYX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWAYXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.32%

-33.99%

-26.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.90%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.59%

-18.69%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-24.52%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.32%

-33.99%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-3.14%

+2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-3.68%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

1.99%

+0.31%

Volatility

AWAYX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.66% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWAYXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

4.83%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

9.82%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

12.46%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.91%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

18.02%

-1.17%

AWAYX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWAYX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWAYX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

AWAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWAYX
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy
6.56%7.36%5.97%2.54%7.90%9.02%3.05%4.11%3.94%7.73%6.17%1.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AWAYX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to AWAYX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAYX dropped -60.32% vs VOO's -33.99%.

AWAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWAYX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer