AVOS vs. GXTG
AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVOS is actively managed, while GXTG is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVOS charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.
Performance
AVOS vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVOS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- 8.28%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 2.92%
- 3Y*
- 0.92%
- 5Y*
- -11.64%
- 10Y*
- —
AVOS vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 8.23% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVOS and GXTG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.77 |
AVOS vs. GXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVOS
GXTG
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVOS
GXTG
Financial Services
AVOS
GXTG
Industrials
AVOS
GXTG
Healthcare
AVOS
GXTG
Consumer Cyclical
AVOS
GXTG
Communication Services
AVOS
GXTG
Energy
AVOS
GXTG
-
Basic Materials
AVOS
GXTG
Consumer Defensive
AVOS
GXTG
-
Utilities
AVOS
GXTG
Real Estate
AVOS
GXTG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVOS vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank
AVOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GXTG
AVOS vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVOS | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVOS vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and GXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVOS | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -67.81% | +63.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -57.20% | +55.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -43.17% | +41.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.72% | — |
Volatility
AVOS vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVOS | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 28.45% | -9.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 28.19% | -9.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 29.87% | -11.20% |
AVOS vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVOS vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison
AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.30% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVOS and GXTG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AVOS.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.
They also come from different issuers: Avos and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 0.50% for GXTG.
Find the right allocation for AVOS and GXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer