AVOS vs. HAIL
AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) and HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVOS is actively managed, while HAIL is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVOS charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HAIL.
Performance
AVOS vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVOS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAIL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -11.36%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- -7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
AVOS vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 8.23% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 12.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVOS and HAIL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.75 |
AVOS vs. HAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVOS
HAIL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
AVOS
HAIL
Financial Services
AVOS
HAIL
Industrials
AVOS
HAIL
Healthcare
AVOS
HAIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
AVOS
HAIL
Communication Services
AVOS
HAIL
Energy
AVOS
HAIL
Basic Materials
AVOS
HAIL
Consumer Defensive
AVOS
HAIL
-
Utilities
AVOS
HAIL
-
Real Estate
AVOS
HAIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVOS vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank
AVOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HAIL
AVOS vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVOS | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVOS vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and HAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVOS | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -65.98% | +61.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -40.20% | +38.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -31.62% | +30.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.77% | — |
Volatility
AVOS vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVOS | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 30.82% | -12.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 32.17% | -13.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 31.86% | -13.19% |
AVOS vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVOS vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison
AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.69% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVOS and HAIL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AVOS.
HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.
They also come from different issuers: Avos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 0.45% for HAIL.
Find the right allocation for AVOS and HAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer