AVLV vs. MFDX
AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVLV returned 23.23%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for MFDX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVLV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MFDX.
Performance
AVLV vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than MFDX's 9.73% return.
AVLV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
AVLV vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 20.64% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 5.92% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 9.73% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | -0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVLV and MFDX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between AVLV and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVLV vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVLV
MFDX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVLV
MFDX
Financial Services
AVLV
MFDX
Industrials
AVLV
MFDX
Energy
AVLV
MFDX
Consumer Cyclical
AVLV
MFDX
Consumer Defensive
AVLV
MFDX
Communication Services
AVLV
MFDX
Healthcare
AVLV
MFDX
Basic Materials
AVLV
MFDX
Utilities
AVLV
MFDX
Real Estate
AVLV
MFDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVLV vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank
AVLV
MFDX
AVLV vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVLV | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.18 | 1.70 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.39 | 2.38 | +2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.31 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.09 | 2.18 | +3.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.39 | 8.66 | +15.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVLV | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 1.70 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.54 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
AVLV vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and MFDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVLV | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -36.05% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -10.66% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.50% | -11.62% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.84% | +1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -6.50% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.68% | -1.09% |
Volatility
AVLV vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is 3.12%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that AVLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVLV | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 4.45% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 11.34% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 13.73% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 15.03% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 16.41% | +0.94% |
AVLV vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVLV vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison
AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than MFDX's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.79% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVLV and MFDX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to AVLV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs MFDX's -36.05%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 18.62% for MFDX. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 18.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.
MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.
AVLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MFDX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.39% for MFDX.
AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVLV and MFDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer