AVES vs. EEMO
AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while EEMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. AVES is actively managed, while EEMO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVES returned 20.73%/yr vs 25.30%/yr for EEMO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVES charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.
Performance
AVES vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVES achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return.
AVES
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEMO
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 18.59%
- YTD
- 40.25%
- 6M
- 41.33%
- 1Y
- 57.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
AVES vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 16.79% | 30.49% | 4.50% | 16.79% | -16.04% | 1.32% |
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 40.25% | 10.99% | 9.88% | 13.90% | -18.73% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVES and EEMO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between AVES and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVES vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVES
EEMO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Financial Services
AVES
EEMO
Technology
AVES
EEMO
Industrials
AVES
EEMO
Basic Materials
AVES
EEMO
Consumer Cyclical
AVES
EEMO
Communication Services
AVES
EEMO
Energy
AVES
EEMO
Consumer Defensive
AVES
EEMO
Real Estate
AVES
EEMO
Healthcare
AVES
EEMO
Utilities
AVES
EEMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVES vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank
AVES
EEMO
AVES vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVES | EEMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 2.36 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 3.28 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.91 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 15.67 | -4.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVES | EEMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.36 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.13 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
AVES vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and EEMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVES | EEMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -48.47% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -14.75% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -26.06% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.32% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -20.17% | +12.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 3.67% | -0.20% |
Volatility
AVES vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) is 6.93%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that AVES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVES | EEMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 14.32% | -7.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 22.10% | -7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 24.45% | -7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 19.33% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 21.59% | -4.61% |
AVES vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVES vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison
AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than EEMO's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.81% | 3.17% | 4.09% | 3.96% | 3.70% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.64% | 2.31% | 2.57% | 3.65% | 3.82% | 1.51% | 1.53% | 2.13% | 13.10% | 5.13% | 1.55% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVES and EEMO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to AVES (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVES dropped -27.40% vs EEMO's -48.47%.
On 3-year performance, EEMO leads with 25.30% vs 20.73% for AVES. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, AVES has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 25.30% return vs 20.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVES.
AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.64% for EEMO.
AVES is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.31% for EEMO.
EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVES and EEMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer