PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUSF vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUSF vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AUSF having a 12.60% return and IVOV slightly higher at 13.17%.


AUSF

1D
-0.21%
1M
3.29%
6M
7.58%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
19.13%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.70%

IVOV

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.84%
6M
8.73%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.36M$2.26M$3.95M
$975.54K$1.11M$1.64M

AUSF vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
12.60%13.69%16.05%22.26%-0.18%27.48%1.27%24.06%-11.18%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
13.17%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and IVOV is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018

0.87

The correlation between AUSF and IVOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AUSF vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AUSF
IVOV

Financial Services

20.1%
21.8%

Technology

15.7%
10.3%

Industrials

13.4%
19.2%

Healthcare

12.3%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.8%

Communication Services

6.6%
0.8%

Utilities

4.5%
4.0%

Real Estate

4.3%
9.5%

Energy

3.3%
6.3%

Basic Materials

2.5%
5.7%

Financial Services

AUSF
20.1%
IVOV
21.8%

Technology

AUSF
15.7%
IVOV
10.3%

Industrials

AUSF
13.4%
IVOV
19.2%

Healthcare

AUSF
12.3%
IVOV
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AUSF
8.8%
IVOV
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

AUSF
7.9%
IVOV
4.8%

Communication Services

AUSF
6.6%
IVOV
0.8%

Utilities

AUSF
4.5%
IVOV
4.0%

Real Estate

AUSF
4.3%
IVOV
9.5%

Energy

AUSF
3.3%
IVOV
6.3%

Basic Materials

AUSF
2.5%
IVOV
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUSF vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AUSF vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUSFIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

1.98

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

7.05

+2.51

AUSF vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOV drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUSFIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-45.99%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-10.58%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-22.61%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-22.61%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.21%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.38%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.97%

-0.98%

Volatility

AUSF vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) at 3.31%. This indicates that AUSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUSFIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.31%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

10.36%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.46%

14.98%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

19.26%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

21.65%

-2.69%

AUSF vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AUSF vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than IVOV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.61%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.61%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUSF and IVOV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AUSF has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to IVOV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 14.47% vs 9.15% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 14.47% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.61% for IVOV.

AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.10% for IVOV.

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUSF and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer