AUSF vs. IVOV
AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index while IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AUSF returned 12.71%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for IVOV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOV.
Performance
AUSF vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than IVOV's 8.98% return.
AUSF
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
AUSF vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 6.72% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -10.79% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -17.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and IVOV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between AUSF and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
AUSF vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AUSF
IVOV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Financial Services
AUSF
IVOV
Technology
AUSF
IVOV
Healthcare
AUSF
IVOV
Industrials
AUSF
IVOV
Communication Services
AUSF
IVOV
Consumer Defensive
AUSF
IVOV
Consumer Cyclical
AUSF
IVOV
Energy
AUSF
IVOV
Real Estate
AUSF
IVOV
Utilities
AUSF
IVOV
Basic Materials
AUSF
IVOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUSF vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank
AUSF
IVOV
AUSF vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUSF | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.97 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 6.80 | +0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUSF | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.37 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.39 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.58 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOV drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and IVOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUSF | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -45.99% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | -10.58% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -22.61% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -22.61% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -0.31% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -5.43% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.07% | -1.06% |
Volatility
AUSF vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 2.41%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUSF | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 4.07% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 10.61% | -3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 15.27% | -5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 19.48% | -5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 21.73% | -2.66% |
AUSF vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AUSF vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than IVOV's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.76% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUSF and IVOV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs IVOV's -45.99%.
On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 7.51% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.
AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.
AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.10% for IVOV.
AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUSF and IVOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer