PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATYM.L vs. HYMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATYM.L vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATYM.L is traded in GBp, while HYMC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYMC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's 0.17% return.


ATYM.L

1D
4.08%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
-5.06%
1Y
82.02%
3Y*
38.85%
5Y*
25.14%
10Y*
24.45%

HYMC

1D
0.20%
1M
-28.05%
YTD
0.17%
6M
1.37%
1Y
675.14%
3Y*
96.61%
5Y*
-3.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATYM.L vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
-4.50%141.04%0.93%11.73%-18.78%88.92%22.40%-8.35%-0.71%
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
0.17%898.94%-8.22%-56.26%-2.99%-92.11%-26.26%0.15%13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ATYM.L and HYMC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018

0.12

Over the past year, ATYM.L and HYMC have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATYM.L:

£1.27B

HYMC:

$2.10B

EPS

ATYM.L:

€0.55

HYMC:

-$1.44

PB Ratio

ATYM.L:

1.93

HYMC:

9.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATYM.L:

€473.55M

HYMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATYM.L:

€148.66M

HYMC:

-$4.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATYM.L:

€170.88M

HYMC:

-$69.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATYM.L vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATYM.L vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATYM.LHYMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.51

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

11.29

-9.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

27.61

-22.18

ATYM.L vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 5.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATYM.L and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATYM.L vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.06%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and HYMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATYM.LHYMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.06%

-98.83%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.50%

-60.37%

+23.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.87%

-62.15%

+25.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.50%

-93.24%

+35.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.98%

-85.32%

+61.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.66%

-64.18%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.05%

24.63%

-9.58%

Volatility

ATYM.L vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) is 16.09%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 26.03%. This indicates that ATYM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATYM.LHYMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.09%

26.03%

-9.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.84%

84.29%

-45.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.66%

116.89%

-71.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.27%

152.26%

-111.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.47%

122.43%

-82.96%

Dividends

ATYM.L vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.75%0.71%1.71%1.91%0.91%7.14%
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ATYM.L vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atalaya Mining Ltd and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
120.87M
0
(ATYM.L) Total Revenue
(HYMC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATYM.L values in EUR, HYMC values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ATYM.L and HYMC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATYM.L and HYMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer