ATTR vs. VOO
ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATTR is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Arin Risk Advisors, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. ATTR is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
ATTR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.72% return.
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
ATTR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.60% | 0.53% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.72% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATTR and VOO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATTR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
ATTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VOO
ATTR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATTR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATTR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATTR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -33.99% | +32.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.88% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -3.67% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
ATTR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATTR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 12.52% | -9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 16.92% | -13.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 17.99% | -14.78% |
ATTR vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATTR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATTR and VOO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for ATTR.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
ATTR is categorized as Long-Short, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for ATTR and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer