ATTR vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. ATTR is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

ATTR vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ATTR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 4.25%
• 6M: 4.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATTR vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	4.25%	0.58%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

ATTR vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATTR	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.81	-0.25	+3.06

Drawdowns

ATTR vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATTR	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-30.34%	+28.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	0.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-27.23%	+27.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-20.90%	+20.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATTR	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97%	0.00%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.97%	12.66%	-9.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.97%	13.32%	-10.35%

ATTR vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATTR vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATTR nor SENT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ATTR or SENT?

On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATTR or SENT?

ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATTR or SENT?

ATTR and SENT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ATTR and SENT?

They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 1.01% for SENT.