ATO.PA vs. NUCG.L
ATO.PA (Atos SE) is a stock, while NUCG.L (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. Over the past 3 years, ATO.PA returned -67.66%/yr vs 33.23%/yr for NUCG.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATO.PA vs. NUCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATO.PA is traded in EUR, while NUCG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NUCG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATO.PA achieves a -30.88% return, which is significantly lower than NUCG.L's 4.54% return.
ATO.PA
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- -30.88%
- 6M
- -37.24%
- 1Y
- -11.08%
- 3Y*
- -67.66%
- 5Y*
- -61.40%
- 10Y*
- -38.20%
NUCG.L
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 33.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATO.PA vs. NUCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO.PA Atos SE | -30.88% | 92.96% | -95.04% | -46.47% |
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 4.54% | 37.58% | 40.59% | -2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATO.PA and NUCG.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATO.PA vs. NUCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ATO.PA
NUCG.L
ATO.PA vs. NUCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atos SE (ATO.PA) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATO.PA | NUCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.14 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.08 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 2.28 | -2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATO.PA vs. NUCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO.PA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than NUCG.L's maximum drawdown of -38.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO.PA and NUCG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATO.PA | NUCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -38.54% | -61.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.73% | -25.80% | -20.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.93% | -38.54% | -60.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.53% | -20.47% | -79.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -11.54% | -27.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.93% | 12.20% | +13.73% |
Volatility
ATO.PA vs. NUCG.L - Volatility Comparison
Atos SE (ATO.PA) has a higher volatility of 15.77% compared to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) at 12.03%. This indicates that ATO.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATO.PA | NUCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.77% | 12.03% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.62% | 28.06% | +14.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.09% | 40.09% | +20.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.50% | 34.94% | +91.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.38% | 34.94% | +57.44% |
Dividends
ATO.PA vs. NUCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATO.PA nor NUCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATO.PA and NUCG.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATO.PA and NUCG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer