ATO.PA vs. GIB-A.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Atos SE (ATO.PA) and CGI Inc (GIB-A.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATO.PA or GIB-A.TO.
Key characteristics
| ATO.PA | GIB-A.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -69.18% | -0.06% |
| 1Y Return | -82.17% | 5.64% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -65.08% | 8.92% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -48.98% | 7.95% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -25.33% | 14.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.94 | 0.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 86.98% | 17.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.58% | -84.57% |
| Current Drawdown | -98.18% | -11.15% |
Fundamentals
| ATO.PA | GIB-A.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | €212.48M | CA$32.82B |
| EPS | -€31.04 | CA$6.94 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Revenue (TTM) | €10.69B | CA$14.45B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | €357.00M | CA$4.38B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | €610.00M | CA$2.54B |
Correlation
The correlation between ATO.PA and GIB-A.TO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATO.PA vs. GIB-A.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ATO.PA achieves a -69.18% return, which is significantly lower than GIB-A.TO's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO.PA has underperformed GIB-A.TO with an annualized return of -25.33%, while GIB-A.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATO.PA vs. GIB-A.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atos SE (ATO.PA) and CGI Inc (GIB-A.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATO.PA vs. GIB-A.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATO.PA nor GIB-A.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ATO.PA vs. GIB-A.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATO.PA drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than GIB-A.TO's maximum drawdown of -84.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO.PA and GIB-A.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATO.PA vs. GIB-A.TO - Volatility Comparison
Atos SE (ATO.PA) has a higher volatility of 37.18% compared to CGI Inc (GIB-A.TO) at 5.54%. This indicates that ATO.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIB-A.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATO.PA vs. GIB-A.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atos SE and CGI Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities