PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATO.PA vs. TCEHY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ATO.PATCEHY
YTD Return-90.44%43.22%
1Y Return-89.85%38.21%
3Y Return (Ann)-74.54%0.43%
5Y Return (Ann)-59.67%7.04%
10Y Return (Ann)-32.72%14.39%
Sharpe Ratio-0.721.29
Sortino Ratio-1.731.97
Omega Ratio0.781.25
Calmar Ratio-0.900.73
Martin Ratio-1.224.58
Ulcer Index73.70%9.87%
Daily Std Dev123.62%34.62%
Max Drawdown-99.46%-73.15%
Current Drawdown-99.44%-39.96%

Fundamentals


ATO.PATCEHY
Market Cap€75.08M$485.75B
EPS-€43.10$2.23
PEG Ratio0.000.63
Total Revenue (TTM)€10.11B$475.81B
Gross Profit (TTM)€1.02B$242.59B
EBITDA (TTM)€742.00M$181.91B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between ATO.PA and TCEHY is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ATO.PA vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ATO.PA achieves a -90.44% return, which is significantly lower than TCEHY's 43.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO.PA has underperformed TCEHY with an annualized return of -32.72%, while TCEHY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-67.19%
14.16%
ATO.PA
TCEHY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATO.PA vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atos SE (ATO.PA) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATO.PA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATO.PA, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATO.PA, currently valued at -1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATO.PA, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.79
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATO.PA, currently valued at -0.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATO.PA, currently valued at -1.20, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.20
TCEHY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TCEHY, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TCEHY, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TCEHY, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TCEHY, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TCEHY, currently valued at 3.59, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.59

ATO.PA vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATO.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATO.PA and TCEHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.72
1.04
ATO.PA
TCEHY

Dividends

ATO.PA vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

ATO.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ATO.PA
Atos SE
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.41%0.00%2.29%2.38%1.32%1.10%1.03%2.44%2.11%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
0.81%6.80%4.27%0.35%0.22%0.27%0.29%0.15%0.25%0.24%0.04%0.20%

Drawdowns

ATO.PA vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATO.PA drawdown since its inception was -99.46%, which is greater than TCEHY's maximum drawdown of -73.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO.PA and TCEHY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-99.36%
-39.96%
ATO.PA
TCEHY

Volatility

ATO.PA vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atos SE (ATO.PA) is 10.74%, while Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that ATO.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.74%
12.05%
ATO.PA
TCEHY

Financials

ATO.PA vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atos SE and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. ATO.PA values in EUR, TCEHY values in USD