ATMP vs. VEEV
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while VEEV (Veeva Systems Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ATMP returned 5.20%/yr vs 16.73%/yr for VEEV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATMP vs. VEEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than VEEV's -28.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ATMP has underperformed VEEV with an annualized return of 5.20%, while VEEV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.73% annualized return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
VEEV
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- -28.53%
- 6M
- -28.54%
- 1Y
- -43.54%
- 3Y*
- -5.80%
- 5Y*
- -11.82%
- 10Y*
- 16.73%
ATMP vs. VEEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | -28.53% | 6.17% | 9.21% | 19.30% | -36.83% | -6.16% | 93.55% | 57.48% | 61.58% | 35.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and VEEV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ATMP and VEEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. VEEV — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
VEEV
ATMP vs. VEEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | VEEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.77 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | -0.86 | +3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | -1.51 | +7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. VEEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than VEEV's maximum drawdown of -61.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and VEEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | VEEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -61.35% | -19.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -50.55% | +43.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -50.55% | +34.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -55.69% | +32.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -55.69% | -19.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -53.21% | +47.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -26.08% | -5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 28.76% | -25.63% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. VEEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.64%, while Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) has a volatility of 14.08%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | VEEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 14.08% | -8.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 29.27% | -18.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 35.87% | -21.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 37.98% | -15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 38.23% | -10.56% |
Dividends
ATMP vs. VEEV - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATMP nor VEEV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and VEEV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEEV has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs VEEV's -61.35%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and VEEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer