ATMP vs. PDD
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while PDD (Pinduoduo Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ATMP returned 15.05%/yr vs -7.73%/yr for PDD. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATMP vs. PDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than PDD's -28.07% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
PDD
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -14.67%
- YTD
- -28.07%
- 6M
- -27.15%
- 1Y
- -18.91%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -7.73%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP vs. PDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -15.97% |
PDD Pinduoduo Inc. | -28.07% | 16.91% | -33.71% | 79.41% | 39.88% | -67.19% | 369.78% | 68.54% | -15.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and PDD is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.14 |
The correlation between ATMP and PDD shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. PDD — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
PDD
ATMP vs. PDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | PDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.91 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | -0.52 | +3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | -1.08 | +6.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. PDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, smaller than the maximum PDD drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and PDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | PDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -87.41% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -41.14% | +33.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -48.40% | +31.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -80.88% | +57.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -59.79% | +54.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -39.32% | +8.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 19.55% | -16.42% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. PDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.64%, while Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) has a volatility of 14.35%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | PDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 14.35% | -8.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 25.50% | -14.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 32.48% | -18.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 68.09% | -45.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 69.37% | -41.70% |
Dividends
ATMP vs. PDD - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATMP nor PDD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and PDD have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDD has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs PDD's -87.41%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and PDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer