ATMP vs. OKTA
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while OKTA (Okta, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ATMP returned 15.05%/yr vs -12.47%/yr for OKTA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATMP vs. OKTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly lower than OKTA's 34.49% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
OKTA
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 43.48%
- YTD
- 34.49%
- 6M
- 28.95%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- -12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP vs. OKTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -14.08% |
OKTA Okta, Inc. | 34.49% | 9.73% | -12.96% | 32.49% | -69.52% | -11.83% | 120.39% | 80.83% | 149.12% | 7.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and OKTA is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2017 | 0.15 |
The correlation between ATMP and OKTA shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. OKTA — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
OKTA
ATMP vs. OKTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Okta, Inc. (OKTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | OKTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.11 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 0.43 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | 1.02 | +4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. OKTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, roughly equal to the maximum OKTA drawdown of -84.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and OKTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | OKTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -84.57% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -37.75% | +30.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -50.57% | +34.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -83.43% | +60.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -60.14% | +54.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -38.27% | +7.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 15.82% | -12.69% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. OKTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.64%, while Okta, Inc. (OKTA) has a volatility of 32.92%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OKTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | OKTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 32.92% | -27.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 48.12% | -37.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 54.65% | -40.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 57.50% | -35.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 53.99% | -26.32% |
Dividends
ATMP vs. OKTA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATMP nor OKTA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and OKTA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OKTA has higher volatility (32.92%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs OKTA's -84.57%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and OKTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer