ATMP vs. DUOL
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while DUOL (Duolingo, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, ATMP returned 21.55%/yr vs -8.39%/yr for DUOL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATMP vs. DUOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than DUOL's -30.13% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
DUOL
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- -30.13%
- 6M
- -37.52%
- 1Y
- -74.37%
- 3Y*
- -8.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP vs. DUOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 0.00% |
DUOL Duolingo, Inc. | -30.13% | -45.87% | 42.93% | 218.92% | -32.97% | -24.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and DUOL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. DUOL — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
DUOL
ATMP vs. DUOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | DUOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.72 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | -0.92 | +3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | -1.26 | +7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. DUOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, roughly equal to the maximum DUOL drawdown of -83.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and DUOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | DUOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -83.35% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -81.19% | +73.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -83.35% | +66.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -77.32% | +71.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -35.76% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 59.48% | -56.35% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. DUOL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.64%, while Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | DUOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 15.67% | -10.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 40.94% | -29.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 62.97% | -48.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 66.21% | -43.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 66.21% | -38.54% |
Dividends
ATMP vs. DUOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATMP nor DUOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and DUOL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUOL has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs DUOL's -83.35%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and DUOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer