ATMP vs. DASH
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while DASH (DoorDash, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ATMP returned 15.05%/yr vs -0.47%/yr for DASH. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATMP vs. DASH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than DASH's -33.51% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
DASH
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -33.51%
- 6M
- -33.81%
- 1Y
- -31.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP vs. DASH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -7.05% |
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | -33.51% | 35.01% | 69.63% | 102.56% | -67.21% | 4.31% | -21.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and DASH is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.15 |
The correlation between ATMP and DASH shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. DASH — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
DASH
ATMP vs. DASH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and DoorDash, Inc. (DASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | DASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.90 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | -0.64 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | -1.10 | +6.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. DASH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, roughly equal to the maximum DASH drawdown of -82.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and DASH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | DASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -82.49% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -47.97% | +40.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -47.97% | +31.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -82.49% | +59.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -46.55% | +40.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -43.51% | +12.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 27.70% | -24.57% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. DASH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.64%, while DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) has a volatility of 13.74%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DASH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | DASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 13.74% | -8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 31.95% | -20.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 44.43% | -30.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 54.01% | -31.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 57.03% | -29.36% |
Dividends
ATMP vs. DASH - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATMP nor DASH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and DASH have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DASH has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs DASH's -82.49%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and DASH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer