ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO).
ATMP and CSBG.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. CSBG.NEO is an actively managed fund by CIBC. It was launched on Jun 18, 2021.
Performance
ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 19.13% | 6.99% | 38.74% | 21.58% | 27.47% | 7.91% |
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF | -1.27% | 4.79% | -6.82% | 3.53% | -5.12% | 3.48% |
Different Trading Currencies
ATMP is traded in USD, while CSBG.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CSBG.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly higher than CSBG.NEO's -1.27% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 19.13%
- 6M
- 21.03%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 28.36%
- 5Y*
- 26.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
CSBG.NEO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- -0.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CSBG.NEO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
CSBG.NEO
ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATMP | CSBG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.67 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.77 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 1.63 | +1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATMP | CSBG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.67 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -0.07 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and CSBG.NEO is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO - Dividend Comparison
ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while CSBG.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.58% | 5.14% | 4.72% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 5.89% | 8.71% | 6.86% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 6.30% |
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 1.21% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -73.72%, which is greater than CSBG.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and CSBG.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | CSBG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.72% | 0.00% | -73.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.11% | 0.00% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.92% | 0.00% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | 0.00% | -17.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 0.00% | +5.81% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. CSBG.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) at 1.36%. This indicates that ATMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSBG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | CSBG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 1.36% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 3.34% | +6.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 5.23% | +13.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 6.50% | +15.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.57% | 6.50% | +21.07% |