PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATMP vs. AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATMP vs. AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than AS's -5.06% return.


ATMP

1D
0.46%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
20.60%
6M
20.43%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
5.20%

AS

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.39%
YTD
-5.06%
6M
-7.56%
1Y
-2.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATMP vs. AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
20.60%1.73%30.10%
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
-5.06%33.58%108.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ATMP and AS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.18

The correlation between ATMP and AS shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATMP vs. AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMP
ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AS
AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMP vs. AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATMPASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.01

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

-0.18

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

-0.36

+6.25

ATMP vs. AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATMP and AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATMP vs. AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than AS's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATMPASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.86%

-40.71%

-40.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-28.78%

+21.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.61%

-15.49%

+9.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.08%

-13.29%

-17.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

14.56%

-11.43%

Volatility

ATMP vs. AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.64%, while Amer Sports, Inc (AS) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATMPASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

10.17%

-4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

29.10%

-18.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.18%

41.31%

-27.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.25%

49.55%

-27.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

49.55%

-21.88%

Dividends

ATMP vs. AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATMP nor AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ATMP and AS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AS has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs AS's -40.71%.

ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATMP and AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer