ATI vs. PULS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ATI (Allegheny Technologies Incorporated) is a stock, while PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, ATI returned 49.99%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for PULS. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATI vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATI achieves a 57.81% return, which is significantly higher than PULS's 1.75% return.

ATI

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 16.58%
• YTD: 57.81%
• 6M: 80.38%
• 1Y: 118.25%
• 3Y*: 69.04%
• 5Y*: 49.99%
• 10Y*: 29.62%

PULS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 2.12%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATI vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ATI Allegheny Technologies Incorporated	57.81%	108.50%	21.05%	52.28%	87.45%	-5.01%	-18.83%	-5.10%	-13.61%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.75%	4.97%	6.12%	6.26%	1.52%	0.48%	1.47%	2.97%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ATI and PULS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2018	0.05

The correlation between ATI and PULS shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ATI vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATI

ATI Risk / Return Rank: 91
ATI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ATI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ATI Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ATI Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ATI Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 100
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATI vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATI	PULS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	11.37	-8.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	32.77	-29.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	7.56	-6.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.70	52.23	-47.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.73	318.30	-306.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATI vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATI Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 11.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATI and PULS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATI	PULS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	11.37	-8.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	5.92	-4.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	2.51	-2.39

Drawdowns

ATI vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATI drawdown since its inception was -94.72%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATI and PULS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATI	PULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.72%	-5.85%	-88.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.31%	-0.09%	-25.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.02%	-0.34%	-37.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.08%	-0.79%	-42.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.66%	-0.09%	-60.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.12%	0.01%	+10.11%

Volatility

ATI vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) has a higher volatility of 11.93% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that ATI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATI	PULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.93%	0.11%	+11.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.84%	0.30%	+28.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.60%	0.41%	+41.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.95%	0.70%	+42.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.49%	1.33%	+50.16%

Dividends

ATI vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

ATI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATI Allegheny Technologies Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.51%	5.51%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.58%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATI and PULS in my portfolio?

ATI and PULS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATI or PULS?

ATI has higher volatility (11.93%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATI dropped -94.72% vs PULS's -5.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.37 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.