PULS vs. ICSH
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH).
PULS and ICSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PULS is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018. ICSH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Dec 11, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PULS or ICSH.
Key characteristics
| PULS | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.35% | 1.90% |
| 1Y Return | 6.60% | 5.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.42% | 2.82% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.78% | 2.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 11.93 | 11.71 |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.56% | 0.48% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.85% | -3.94% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PULS and ICSH is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PULS vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PULS achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 1.90% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PULS vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PULS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PULS vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PULS vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than ICSH's 5.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.68% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.92% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 5.12% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% | 0.46% |
Drawdowns
PULS vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PULS drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULS and ICSH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PULS vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) has a higher volatility of 0.11% compared to iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH) at 0.09%. This indicates that PULS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.