PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PULS vs. MINT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PULSMINT
YTD Return2.35%2.34%
1Y Return6.60%6.47%
3Y Return (Ann)3.42%2.45%
5Y Return (Ann)2.78%2.16%
Sharpe Ratio11.9317.79
Daily Std Dev0.56%0.37%
Max Drawdown-5.85%-4.62%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between PULS and MINT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

PULS vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PULS having a 2.35% return and MINT slightly lower at 2.34%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18.17%
14.50%
PULS
MINT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund

PULS vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PULS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.


MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
Expense ratio chart for MINT: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%
Expense ratio chart for PULS: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PULS vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PULS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PULS, currently valued at 11.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.0011.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PULS, currently valued at 30.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0030.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PULS, currently valued at 7.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.507.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PULS, currently valued at 66.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.0066.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PULS, currently valued at 465.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00465.22
MINT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MINT, currently valued at 17.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.0017.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MINT, currently valued at 74.49, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0074.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MINT, currently valued at 18.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.5018.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MINT, currently valued at 217.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.00217.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MINT, currently valued at 1203.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001,203.76

PULS vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PULS Sharpe Ratio is 11.93, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.79. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of PULS and MINT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio6.008.0010.0012.0014.0016.0018.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.93
17.79
PULS
MINT

Dividends

PULS vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than MINT's 5.21% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
5.68%5.48%2.30%1.19%1.85%2.92%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
5.21%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%0.80%0.88%

Drawdowns

PULS vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PULS drawdown since its inception was -5.85%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULS and MINT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.10%-0.08%-0.06%-0.04%-0.02%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay00
PULS
MINT

Volatility

PULS vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) has a higher volatility of 0.11% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) at 0.07%. This indicates that PULS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.06%0.08%0.10%0.12%0.14%0.16%0.18%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.11%
0.07%
PULS
MINT